Hey, folks, the award will take into consideration only the new submissions submitted via the new rules (see private forum)
So, nobody will be able to cheat or say that others cheated in the past for the award :] Total fair play!
Also the new submission guidelines will eliminate (hopefully LOL) the problem of any duplicates.
Submitting Same Vulnerabilities?
-
- Posts:296
- Joined:Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:43 pm
- Contact:
Re: Submitting Same Vulnerabilities?
I'm just trying to help out. As far as I can tell, all the incidents I put on my previous post were duplicates of others. I do encourage you to link me to ones you disagree with and I'll look at them again for youret2libc wrote:here's 5 duplicates from you found in the space of about a minute
https://www.xssposed.org/incidents/121192/
https://www.xssposed.org/incidents/105493/
https://www.xssposed.org/incidents/105476/
https://www.xssposed.org/incidents/101971/
https://www.xssposed.org/incidents/100454/
I'm sure there's many more but I don't suffer from severe autism therefore I have better things to do with my spare time than analyze each of your individual submissions (even though i know some i haven't listed were stolen directly from me) - if you're going to constantly be analyzing everyones submissions for 'duplicates' then wouldn't it make sense to look at your OWN submissions? I mean I know the majority of them are in garbage sites that nobody gives a fuck about, but still...
Thanks for pointing out some duplicates I made. Obviously, these were accidental and I cannot delete them now so could admin please check and delete the duplicates I made that MLT pointed out? Also, you raised a good point in regards to "garbage sites" (which I understand you would call sites with super-low Alexa?). I've thought about this before but from my experience in submitting vulnerabilities here I've had an even spread of website owners of super high to super low Alexa rank websites contact me to remediate vulnerabilities.
I'll ignore everything else that's completely irrelevant about your post as I understand you're quite disgruntled that I pointed out lots of duplicates you made intentionally.
Sounds great, thanks for your replyx1admin wrote:Hey, folks, the award will take into consideration only the new submissions submitted via the new rules (see private forum)
So, nobody will be able to cheat or say that others cheated in the past for the award :] Total fair play!
Also the new submission guidelines will eliminate (hopefully LOL) the problem of any duplicates.
Re: Submitting Same Vulnerabilities?
My eBay.com submission was a duplicate? you also reported reguar post-based xss as a duplicate saying i was using post data glitch LOL? are you too fuckin stupid to understand the difference between GET and POST? and apparently im using a 'bypass' to report 'duplicates' of MY OWN SUBMISSIONS? how the fuck does that work? in the past you've also reported several other peoples submissions as duplicates when its the same site with a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PARAMATERSpam404Online wrote:ret2libc wrote: I'm just trying to help out. As far as I can tell, all the incidents I put on my previous post were duplicates of others.
All i'm saying is that you're on thin ice, Cameron. Tread carefully.
this is good to know, hey i think you should recruit spam404 it seems he desperately wants to become an admin of this site... the kid who's been here 2 months wants to run the site alreadyx1admin wrote:Hey, folks, the award will take into consideration only the new submissions submitted via the new rules (see private forum)
So, nobody will be able to cheat or say that others cheated in the past for the award :] Total fair play!
Also the new submission guidelines will eliminate (hopefully LOL) the problem of any duplicates.
-
- Posts:296
- Joined:Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:43 pm
- Contact:
Re: Submitting Same Vulnerabilities?
2 XSS submissions for the same parameter? -ret2libc wrote:My eBay.com submission was a duplicate?
https://www.xssposed.org/incidents/121165/
https://www.xssposed.org/incidents/121171/
What one? Can you link? I do understand the difference. However, I am under the impression if a search function is vulnerable (for examples sake) and both a POST and GET is posted one is a duplicate. Maybe admin can clear this up?ret2libc wrote:you also reported reguar post-based xss as a duplicate saying i was using post data glitch LOL? are you too fuckin stupid to understand the difference between GET and POST?
Sorry if you misunderstood but I didn't mean all your submissions on the list were using the POST method duplicate glitch. Just a majority.
I hold my hands up to this, that was a mistake and I'm sorry (I've made sure not to do this again). However, I do think the recent changes discourage this with the 24 hour limit per domainret2libc wrote:in the past you've also reported several other peoples submissions as duplicates when its the same site with a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT PARAMATER
Re: Submitting Same Vulnerabilities?
Hey folks, any messages (regardless from whom they come from) with direct insults/etc will deleted. Please don't turn the forum into garbage.
The topic is closed, new submission guidelines (almost done) will resolve the problem of duplicates.
The topic is closed, new submission guidelines (almost done) will resolve the problem of duplicates.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests